PhysicsX tests car-aerodynamics surrogates on new vehicles with its 20,000-run PXNetCar dataset
Blog physicsx.ai
PhysicsX argues that DrivAerNet++ (8,121 geometries from three baselines) and Luminary SHIFT-SUV (1,994 geometries from two baselines) vary too little to test generalisation, because random splits put morphs of the same baseline in both training and test sets. It built PXNetCar, a proprietary dataset of 20,486 RANS simulations in STAR-CCM+ over 260 baseline vehicles with about 100 variants each. PhysicsX reports that state-of-the-art architectures generalise poorly to new vehicles and across CFD setups, that out-of-distribution error falls steadily as training data becomes more diverse, and that training on several datasets recovers in-simulator accuracy. The dataset is not released.
Share on LinkedIn, X or Bluesky, or .
Know related work that belongs here? Suggest a link
Something wrong on this page? Tell the editor
More news
All news- ReleasegNucleus AI publishes Parametric CAD Bench v3 for AI agents that author parametric CAD
- ReleaseUniversalAGI releases SUV-PT, an SUV aerodynamics model with 1.1% drag error on DrivAerML
- EventAutoCFD5 uses DrivAerML as the common training set for its AI/ML comparison of road-car surrogates
- ReleaseLuminary's SHIFT-NVH predicts road-induced body vibration from part gauges, material and speed